The RazorKnow Organisation

November 26, 2008

Franchise Attorney; Very Well Known Dies

Filed under: Great Legal Resources Tips — admin @ 7:48 am

Recently a well-known Franchise Attorney Died. Now all the other franchise attorneys are falling all over themselves saying what a great guy he was? Yes, perhaps, but he was a lawyer. All lawyers steal from the productivity of the Nation and all franchise lawyers are a plague on the franchise model and industry. They say this lawyer was an intellectual. Indeed and maybe he was, but all lawyers live in a made up world of laws, which they and their law-making lawyer politician friends create; a little self-serving.

So is an intellectual lawyer thinking on issues and laws, which are made up and how these might conflict really an intellectual? Oh, I suppose in a virtual world they could be. You know like a punk teenager who listens to rap or techno music, while pounding the Twinkies between taking crystal meth and/or smoking pot and is busy learning all the rules in a video game and learning the best way to rack up the most points or in this case with lawyers fees. Are lawyers really intellectuals or are they criminals like international terrorists screwing over entrepreneurs and free enterprise like virus-ridden parasites? Personally the more lawyers who die the better for the franchise industry, the method in which they die, is irrelevant, they have been stealing from this industry long enough.

I have not heard one non-lawyer say anything nice about this well-known lawyer who died, nor do I expect to. There is no greater scum on the planet than lawyers, whether they be government lawyers, private practice lawyers or franchise lawyers. I hope they all burn in hell. This article is my opinion and therefore I am exercising my right to free speech for as long as that right lasts, as there are lawyers who want us to worship them and wish to take away even that right unless it happens to agree with their opinion.

To the family of this dead franchise lawyer, he died for a noble and just cause, because now that he is dead he can no longer screw over franchisors or franchisees and that is best for the American People, as the best lawyer is one who is no longer breathing. In his death he has greatly helped the free enterprise system and for that I wish to thank his family for their sacrifice. There are others who would rather he burn in hell for eternity, but that would not be the polite or political correct thing to say during your grieving process. Hopefully once you get this behind you, someone will sue your family so his ill-gotten gains will live again.

Lance Winslow - EzineArticles Expert Author

“Lance Winslow” - Online Think Tank forum board. If you have innovative thoughts and unique perspectives, come think with Lance; http://www.WorldThinkTank.net/wttbbs/

November 24, 2008

Fundamentals of Contract Law

Filed under: Great Legal Resources Tips — admin @ 9:58 pm

No matter where you live in North America, you must have seen some humoristic vignettes depicting a not-so-trustworthy Realtor intent at selling a house to some innocent-looking couple. My favorite vignette, which still makes me chuckle today, goes back to a few years ago when I was practicing real estate at United Realty. It involved a Real Estate Agent of Pompeii Realty, briefcase in hand, in the process of selling a house to an ancient Roman couple sometimes around 100 BC . The house is overlooking Mt. Vesuvius. There is a black, threatening, ominous plume of smoke coming out of the top of the volcano, and the Roman couple looks somewhat startled when the Real Estate Agent - big smile on his face - delivers the punchline: ” Plus, with a view like this what could possibly go wrong” !

What is it exactly that you do when you sign a ‘contract’ . The term ‘contract’ means a promise or a set of promises made by one person to another, which the Courts will enforce. A contract can contain a number of promises or ‘terms’ to be performed by either party. The person who makes the promise is called the ‘promissor’ and the person who can enforce that promise is called the ‘promissee’ . If the contract contains several mutual promises, each party will be both a promissor and a promissee. Contracts of Purchase and Sale of land and interests in land usually have lots of mutual promises. Contracts are a crucial part of every business transaction, but not nearly as much as in Real Estate. For instance, some contracts are made verbally while others are made by simply exchanging letters or even e-mails. This is not the case in Real Estate, where it is a requirement at Law that contracts be written down in usually lengthy legal forms to avoid uncertainty, ambiguity and to be binding .

A contract has seven essential elements:

Offer.

Acceptance.

Consideration

Legal Intent.

Capacity.

Legal Object.

Genuine Consent.

Each of these elements must be present for a contract to be binding and enforceable. Let’s examine them individually.

OFFER

An offer is the promise made by one party to another. Save and except in Real Estate where the offer must be in writing, an offer can be made in any form. In all circumstances, however, an offer must be made in clear an unambigous terms. If more than one interpretation can be given to an offer, neither interpretation will be followed by the Courts. There are ‘unilateral’ and ‘bilateral’ offers. Offers to purchase real property are bilateral, i.e. containing the exchange of mutual promises.

An offer is not made forever. Offers can either be finalized, when all mutual promises are fulfilled. Or they can expire, if not timely accepted. Or they can be released, if one of the parties does not - or cannot - deliver on the promise. Offers can also be revoked after acceptance, unless a term of the offer stipulates that revocation is not allowed.- as it is now the case in British Columbia for offers involving land. A ‘counter-offer’ is simply an offer from the offeree back to the offeror. The legal effect of a counter-offer is to terminate the original offer and substitute the offer of the offeree. What this means in practicality is that if the counter-offer is not accepted, the offeree cannot try to accept the first offer unless it is tendered again by the offeror. This is a point often times neglected in Real Estate, which has caused several tears to be spilled.

ACCEPTANCE

The acceptance, like the offer, must be given in clear terms. It must be a positive act. For instance, an offer cannot state “If I don’t hear from you, I will assume you have accepted”. Doing nothing will never be considered legal acceptance. The rule at Law is that where an offer is required by statute to be in writing, then also the acceptance must be in writing in order for the offer to become a contract binding on both parties. Such is the case in Real Estate. An acceptance has no effect until it is communicated to the offeror. Communication can be made by ‘instantaneous means’ as in the case of telephone or teletype or fax communications, or e-mail or hand-delivery and by ‘non-instantaneous means’ such as postal mail. The Law gives the responsibility to the offeror to specify how he wants the offer to be accepted. If the offeror chooses a method like slow mail, then he assumes the risks involved in that type of service (such as misdelivery).

CONSIDERATION

For an offer and acceptance to form a contract there must be consideration or the contract must be signed under seal. Consideration is defined as ’some right, benefit or profit accruing to the promissor or some forebearance, detriment, loss or otherwise responsibility suffered by the promissee’ . What this means is that the party trying to enforce the contract must have ‘paid’ something in exchange for the promise of the other party. Consideration must be of real value, but it does not have to be money. For example, a mutual exchange of promises is consideration per se.

LEGAL INTENTION

For a person to be bound to a contract, he must seriously intend to create legal obligations. For example, inviting a guest for dinner would normally not be considered a contract intended to create legal obligations. The Law presumes that there is legal intention in a contract involving total strangers. On the other hand, if the contract is between family members the Law presumes that there is no intention to be so bound (non arm-length transaction). However, this presumption can be reversed if there is evidence to show otherwise.

CAPACITY

Even when all the foregoing essential elements exist, a contract can still be void, voidable or illegal. A void contract is one which is deemed at Law never to have existed. A voidable contract is slightly different: it exists until it is repudiated by one of the parties. An illegal contract is one which is made for an illegal purpose, and which is therefore always void. Examples of voidable contracts are the ones made when one of the parties is an infant, i.e. a minor or under the majority age. In this case the contract can be voided by the infant. Likewise, when one of the parties is legally insane, the contract is voidable. A special case is a contract stipulated when one of the parties is a limited company or corporation. Three questions must be first answered before the contract can be enforceable: 1) whether the corporation does in fact exist and 2) whether it has the capacity to enter into the contract and 3) whether the person signing on behalf of the corporation is, in fact, the authorized signatory.

LEGAL OBJECT

Quite aside from blatantly illegal contracts such as, for examples, contracts to commit a crime or tort until recently here in British Columbia certain other types of contracts where considered illegal. For example, until the mid-80’s contracts involving the sale of land made on a Sunday were deemed to be a contravention of s.4 of the Lord’s Day Act(now repealed) and, thus, illegal and void. Since then, the Supreme Court of Canada has ruled that the application of s.4 - in fact the entire Lord’s Day Act - is unconstitutional in that it infringes on the freedom of conscience and religion guaranteed by the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedom.

GENUINE CONSENT

If one of the parties makes a misrepresentation or if the contract contains an inherent mistake, the contract may still not be binding. A misrepresentation is, by definition, a statement which is false and which must have induced one of the parties to enter into the contract. A misrepresentation can be innocent, negligent or fraudulent and different remedies are available to the party suffering damages because of the nature of the misrepresentation. If the representation is innocent, the party can sue for rescission of the contract. In the case of negligent or fraudulent misrepresentation, the affected party can sue for damages as well. Although misrepresentation requires a statement to be made, in Real Estate silence too can result in some form of misrepresentation. Disclosure of latent defects is one such example: failure to disclose latent defects on the part of the Seller will not, by itself, affect the consent of the parties but will have similar consequences as misrepresentation.

In the case of inherent mistake, true consent of the parties does not exist. The logic behind this notion is that the parties were negotiating for a subject matter other than the one stipulated in the contract. A specific type of mistake is sometimes referred to as ‘non est factum’ , Latin for ‘this is not my deed’ . This occurs when a person executes one form of document thinking the document is something else. Duress and undue influence both affect the genuine consent element of a contract. Duress occurs when a person is forced to enter into the contract against his will. As a result, the Courts will find the contract voidable at his option. Undue influence, on the other hand, is more subtle. Like duress it results in one party losing his free will to contract out. However it occurs more frequently when a person is in a superior or dominant position in relation to another and uses this influential position to induce the other to enter into the contract. Again, if undue influence is found, the contract is voidable at the option of the innocent party.

Luigi Frascati

luigi@dccnet.com

www.luigifrascati.com
Real Estate Chronicle

Luigi Frascati - EzineArticles Expert Author

Luigi Frascati is a Real Estate Agent based in Vancouver, British Columbia. He is the author of the Real Estate Chronicle, his weblog published online. Luigi holds a Bachelor Degree in Economics and has been practising real estate for the past eighteen years

Copyright Transfer or License - How you can share your copyright and still keep it

Filed under: Great Legal Resources Tips — admin @ 3:03 am

You can transfer the copyright to an image, either by selling it or giving it away. If so, you give up all rights that you had in the image as if you never took the photograph. But the only way to give up a copyright to an image is in writing.

Even when copies of a photo are distributed, the photographer retains the copyrights to the image. If you give your client copies of the digital files, without more, you are not giving up your copyrights.

You also can give specific, limited rights for the use of that copyright, while maintaining ownership of the copyright for the image. It’s called “licensing.” For example, you give a magazine the limited right to print one of your photos. You send a copy of the digital file or the negative/chrome, but you state that you are granting the magazine specific limited usage of the image, whether it is for printing 100,000 one-run copies, for a specific time-frame, or however you want to specify the license. In a portrait or event business, you can give copies of the images to your clients so that they can have prints made. Limit their rights to personal use, only, and you keep them from selling the images to the Enquirer.

It’s the closest thing to having your cake and eating it, too. Unless you state specifically in writing and sign the document that gives your copyright to an image to someone else, you keep the copyright, regardless of what else you do.

Copyright 2005 Carolyn E. Wright

Carolyn Wright - EzineArticles Expert Author

— ABOUT THE AUTHOR —

Carolyn E. Wright, Esq., has a unique legal practice aimed squarely at the needs of photographers. A pro photographer herself, Carolyn has the credentials and the experience to protect photographers. She’s represented clients in multimillion dollar litigations, but also has the desire to help new photographers just starting their careers. Carolyn graduated from Emory University School of Law with a Juris Doctor, and from Tennessee Tech University with a Masters of Business Administration degree and a Bachelor of Science degree in music.

She wrote the book on photography law. “88 Secrets to the Law for Photographers,” by Carolyn and well-known professional photographer, Scott Bourne, is scheduled for fall 2005 release by Olympic Mountain School Press. Carolyn also is a columnist for PhotoFocus Magazine.

Carolyn specializes in wildlife photography and her law website is http://www.photoattorney.com.

November 23, 2008

Patent - Business Method Patents - Part II

Filed under: Great Legal Resources Tips — admin @ 1:14 pm

In this second article on business method patents we’re going to continue our discussion on what happens when two companies are battling it out for the same patent.

There are two ways that an Internet patent can be used. The first way is to use it offensively against a major competitor to help eat into their market share. The second way is to use it defensively against a major competitor who is threatening to sue based on one of their patents. Case studies show that most companies are less likely to go to court when the opposing company can show that it has a patent. Usually these companies agree to a truce by cross licensing each other’s patents.

Here is an example of this.

Company A and Company B both sell tickets online. This includes services for exchanging unwanted tickets and also earning rewards for being a frequent purchaser. Company A happens to hold a patent on a method of exchanging tickets. Company B has a patent on a way of exchanging rewards points. Even though each company believes that the other company is infringing on their patent neither one goes to court over it. Instead they decide to cross license their patents so that each company can perform both services, exchanging tickets and rewards points.

So how is it determined who gets a patent? What happens when business A applies for a patent but business B can show that it was using the method for a year prior to filing? Business B can either stop the patent from going through right then and there or it can wait and invalidate the patent at a later time. The key to this whole procedure is that the use of business B’s method MUST have been public knowledge prior to business A filing for a patent. If business B used the patent confidentially then business A will be granted the patent even though business B used the method first. However, in a 1999 amendment to this law, even though business A gets the patent, business B can still use the method without any penalty.

An example of this is as follows. Business A has been using a certain method of accounting for many years but never disclosed it to the general public. Company B, over the course of time and totally unaware that business A has already created this method, develops the method themselves and files for a patent. When company B finds out that company A has been using this accounting method they file a lawsuit against company A. Company B is granted their patent but company A is allowed to continue its use of the method without any penalty of law.

Just as a note. If company A had been using the method publicly before company B filed for the patent, the patent issued to company B would have been invalidated or possibly would have never been granted at all.

In the next article in this series we’re going to discuss the legal requirements for getting a business method patent.

« Previous Page